http://www.guardian.co.uk/edinburgh/2010/sep/09/edinburgh-protest-us-consulate

The Scottish Afghan Society protests against the Quran burning

http://news.stv.tv/scotland/196542-afghan-group-in-edinburgh-protest-over-us-koran-burning/

Scottish Afghan Society protest against the Quran Burning

Afghanistan National Cricket Team

Subject: RE: Press release , Afghan cricket team visits Glasgow , press interviews welcome


For immediate release

The Afghanistan National Cricket Team is in Scotland to play their cricket from Wednesday to Saturday August 11-14 ICC Intercontinental Cup Scotland v Afghanistan at Citylets Ayr (New Cambusdoon). This is the first time Afghanistan is in Scotland. On Monday and Tuesday August 16 and 17 ICC One-Day Internationals Scotland v Afghanistan at Citylets Ayr (New Cambusdoon Afghanistan will play their last match.

The Scottish Afghan Society is hosting an official dinner for the Afghan National Team to honour their achievements in a very short time. The Afghan Team does not even have a National Stadium where they can practice their Cricket and they have to go to neighbouring countries for practice. Our guest of honour include the Afghan National Team, Anas Sarwar MP, MSPs Anne Mclaughlin, representative from the Glasgow lord Provost office Mr. Hanzala Malik, Strathclyde Police Mr. Rury Nicolson and other invited guests including the Afghan Community in Scotland.
Cricket is the only positive things right now in Afghanistan which promote the country's name, image and many young people are queuing to join and National Team.

For further information please contact Mr. Mohammad N Asif (Chair) Scottish Afghan Society
07779573331
nmasif@hotmail.com

Venue:
Kabana Restaurant
64 Seaward Street
Glasgow, G41 1HJ
Time: 19:00hrs
Date: 09/08/2010

READ THE TRUE STORY OF NATO MARJAH OPERATION

Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
Refugees from Marjah, in Lashkar Gah
March 2010
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2nd 2010

Executive Summary

NATO‟s Operation Moshtarak, launched in February 2010 in Helmand province, was the first deployment after the beginning of the much-debated surge of 30,000 additional US troops. It was billed as the largest military operation since the invasion of 2001. The planning for the operation emphasised the needs of the Afghan people, and the importance of winning hearts and minds as part of a classic counter-insurgency operation. However, the reality on the ground did not match the rhetoric. Welcome improvements in the size and conduct of military operations were undermined by a lack of sufficient corresponding measures in the political and humanitarian campaigns.
This report reviews the local perceptions of the operation from more than 400 Afghan men from Marjah, Lashkar Gah and Kandahar, interviewed by the International Council on Security and Development (ICOS) in March 2010.

ICOS field research reveals that Operation Moshtarak has contributed to high levels of anger among local Afghan: 61% of those interviewed feel more negative about NATO forces than before the military offensive. In other words, the objective of winning “hearts and minds” - one of the fundamental tenets of the new counter-insurgency strategy – was not met.
The findings of the report reveal three key “lessons learned” which will be critical to the success of the upcoming offensive in Kandahar: tackling Taliban recruitment; refugee support and aid capacity and deliverables; and management of the grassroots political dynamics.
The legitimate grievances of the people of Marjah are being exploited by the Taliban, who will seek to recruit and radicalise the region‟s angry young men. Of those interviewed, 95% believe more young Afghans have joined the Taliban in the last year. 78% of the respondents were often or always angry, and 45% of those stated they were angry at the NATO occupation, civilian casualties and night raids.

Operation Moshtarak and similar operations in the future provide a perfect propaganda tool for use by the Taliban in their recruitment strategies, unless the conduct of such operations is changed to address legitimate grievances through deploying what this report characterises as “non-violent security instruments” within a “security eco-system” concept. This mandates managing all operations (military, aid and political) with an understanding that an action in one area affects dynamics in another area. Additionally, the report recommends the adoption of a new “Counter-insurgency Impact Equation - Balance any negative impact with a positive impact; Ensure that the positive impact is greater than the negative impact.”
Refugee support and aid capacity must be strengthened dramatically. Despite widespread advanced planning and publicity regarding Operation Moshtarak, there were, in the end, very little aid or infrastructure available for displaced persons. 97% of Afghans interviewed by ICOS said that the operation had led to new flows of internally displaced people. Thousands of displaced Afghans were forced to move to non-existent or overcrowded refugee camps with insufficient food, medical supplies or shelter. Local aid agencies were overwhelmed, and in some areas were not present at all.

Another issue causing friction with the local population is the lack of an effective or realistic counter-narcotics strategy. Poppy crop eradication - which took place during the operation – and a new policy of paying poppy farmers to eradicate their crops themselves, undermines the local economy without putting sustainable alternatives in place. Eradicating the poppy crop is opposed by 66% of Afghans interviewed by ICOS.
59% of those interviewed believed the Taliban will return to Marjah after the Operation. Alarmingly, 67% did not support a strong NATO-ISAF presence in their province and 71% stated they wanted the NATO forces to leave.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
3
Furthermore, 67% of those interviewed stated they did not believe NATO and the Afghan government would win against the Taliban, with 14% saying that NATO would “never” win.
However, 67% want NATO forces to clear the ring road from Lashkar Gah to Kandahar to Kabul, and start an operation against insurgents in Kandahar, indicating the importance of these issues to the local population. There is an “agreement on ends but not means”: locals do not want the Taliban to return but they also do not want to endure unnecessary suffering as part of NATO‟s response to the insurgency.
To learn from these experiences, new approaches must be taken in advance of the Kandahar operation to support the offensive. The report recommends a coordinated series of “Dramatic Positive Local Actions” before, during, and after the Kandahar operation which will engage with grassroots communities and prevent the generation of more animosity towards the NATO presence and the Afghan government.
To prevent a repeat of Operation Moshtarak, NATO and the international community must deploy a series of short and long term initiatives. To tackle Taliban recruitment, marriage and land allowance schemes should be established to tie young Afghans into stable social and economic structures.
To strengthen humanitarian aid capacity, a series of fully resourced aid initiatives should be rolled out, starting with fully-equipped field hospitals and ambulance system. These measures should also include “camps in a box” to provide shelter, food, water and active engagement with displaced people to help them move to the camps or, when possible, to return to their homes. A surge of food aid capacity is needed. Aid agencies should be integrated into military planning processes, provided with the resources and capacity necessary to deal with the needs at hand, and if necessary, NATO forces should be integrated into relief and aid activities.
As part of this series of “Dramatic Positive Local Actions”, NATO should engage decisively with grassroots communities on the issue of religious respect and anger related to Afghan civilian casualties caused by NATO military actions. This process should include symbolic cultural and political acts linked to public statements of apology; programmes such as a mosque restore and shrines restoration, and Quran distribution schemes. These are intended to demonstrate in a dramatic grass roots political way, commitment to the Afghan people and build support for the international presence in what has become a hyper-politicized community. The dynamics at the local level must be changed dramatically and in the very short term, in advance of the Kandahar operations.

NATO and the international community have made mistakes, but their presence in Afghanistan is not a mistake, and neither is the recent surge. The policy mix is not working, and this has to be dramatically renovated in the very short term. Learning lessons from Marjah is critical for the success of the upcoming operation in Kandahar. Urgent steps must be taken to dramatically reshape local relationships, and prevent a repeat of the negative impacts of Operation Moshtarak in Kandahar.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
4
Helmand and Kandahar provinces
Locations of Marjah and Kandahar City
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
5
Overview of Operation Moshtarak
The main focus of Operation Moshtarak was on the Nad Ali district of Helmand province, targeting in particular the area of Marjah, which for several years had been under the control of the Taliban. Up to 15,000 American, British, other coalition forces and Afghan troops were deployed for the operation. The offensive has been described as the largest in Afghanistan since the fall of the Taliban government in October-December 2001.
The target of 30,000 additional US troops announced by President Barack Obama is a welcome and necessary addition to the international presence. Only with a sufficient military footprint can NATO forces hold ground taken from the insurgents and begin taking the initiative from the Taliban.
The offensive was extensively planned in advance, and the emphasis was placed on protecting the Afghan people. Above all, Operation Moshtarak was to be Afghan-led. Afghan security forces were placed in the frontline alongside NATO combat troops, and Afghan officials were on standby as a “government in a box” ready to provide administration and services after the district fell.

However, these welcome improvements in the conduct of military operations were undermined by a lack of corresponding measures in the political campaign and development support.
Research Reveals Serious Post-Operation Issues
In March 2010, the International Council on Security and Development (ICOS) conducted a series of interviews in Lashkar Gah district, near Marjah in Helmand province, and in Kandahar city in Kandahar province. Those interviewed included displaced families from Marjah. Prior field research was carried out in Lashkar Gah in October 2009.1 In March, ICOS interviewed 427 Afghan men, and asked a range of closed and open-ended questions to establish their reactions to Operation Moshtarak, as well as their opinions on the Taliban insurgency, the NATO presence, and forced poppy crop eradication.2 The results reveal that the offensive has had negative results, and has exposed the challenges that still need to be overcome by the „new‟ international strategy.
These interviews build on previous ICOS field research in Afghanistan, as well as in Iraq and Somalia. The interviews indicate that a lack of attention and support to effective aid, developmental and economic instruments and counter-narcotics policies has contributed to alienating and radicalising populations in affected conflict zones. The latest ICOS field research supports this view, and raises troubling questions about the support for Operation Moshtarak, and lessons that must be learned and addressed in advance of planned operations in Kandahar.
The main lesson that emerges from this series of interviews with Afghans, some of whom were directly affected by Operation Moshtarak, is not in improving military tactics but, rather, in focusing the efforts of the international community and the Afghan government in three key areas:

 Taliban recruitment: the insurgency continues to benefit in their recruitment efforts from the mistakes of the international coalition.
 Refugee and aid response and capacity: removing Taliban influence must be accompanied by the timely and effective delivery of emergency aid and refugee assistance, as well as longer-term developmental initiatives.
1 Using a group of 100 Afghan men.
2 The results of open-ended questions were grouped into selected categories.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
6
 Grassroots political dynamics: NATO engagement with local Afghan communities is very weak, and lacks a positive grassroots political dynamic. Although there is now recognition of the community-level anger caused by civilian casualties, night raids and poppy crop eradication, the response to this dynamic has not been sufficient and has not addressed these dynamics in an effective way.
A. Taliban Recruitment: Drawing from Afghanistan’s Angry Young Men
Rising numbers of young Afghans joining the Taliban
The lack of humanitarian forward planning for Operation Moshtarak undermined one of the fundamental tenets of the new counter-insurgency strategy: that the hearts and minds of the population must be at the centre of any military operation. Military force is still the predominant element in the Western counter-insurgency strategy.
These flaws have created serious blow-back: the legitimate grievances of the people of Marjah now risk being exploited by insurgent groups, which have already been gaining in strength.3
Q1 Over the last year, do you think more young Afghans have joined the Taliban? Yes
409
95.8% No
13
3.0% No opinion / Don’t know
2
0.5% No answer
3
0.7%

These insurgent groups will use the opportunity to increase their recruitment efforts, particularly among the many thousands of displaced people. The refugee camp in Lashkar Gah was already a key Taliban recruitment site. With the influx of thousands more civilians, who have been forced from their homes by NATO actions, the prospects for Taliban recruitment will become stronger.
Just over half of Afghans interviewed believe that a significant reason that many young men are now joining the Taliban now is because of jihad – their legitimate grievances are being expressed through extremist action against the „occupying‟ foreign forces. Once radicalised, these angry young men will be much harder to draw back into legitimate life.
3 For an excellent overview of the dynamics surrounding the Taliban resurgence see A. Giustozzi, Decoding the Neo-Taliban: Insights from the Afghan Field. Columbia University Press, 2009.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
7
Q2 Why do you think other Afghan men join the Taliban? Job or Money
242
57% Jihad
229
54% Social status
155
36% Coerced into doing so
147
34% International Occupation
34
8% Actions of the Afghan government
6
1% Lack of security
5
1% Afghan politics
3
1% Other
3
1% Lack of education
2
0%

Angry Young Men – A Ready Source of Taliban Recruits
Although the Taliban leadership is composed of ideologically committed individuals, the majority of the rank and file recruits and occasional collaborators do not usually share the ideological or political convictions of the leadership (see diagram).
ICOS field research reveals that young men, who are often unemployed, unmarried, and disenfranchised, make up the majority of these rank and file recruits, because they are the most susceptible to recruitment by insurgent groups.4
There is a high proportion of these young men in Afghanistan – 47.9% of the male population is aged between 15 and 29, a phenomenon known as the youth bulge, which is found in many conflict zones. Afghanistan is also characterised by a weak and unstable labour market: according to the country‟s Central Statistics Organisation, 90% of jobs can be classified as vulnerable employment that do not provide stable, secure income.5
4 Fotini, C and Semple, M „Flipping the Taliban: How to Win in Afghanistan‟, Foreign Affairs, July/August 2009.
5 Central Statistics Organisation, The National Risk and Vulnerability Assessment (NRVA) 2007/2008. Available at http://nrva.cso.gov.af/ Ideological Leaders Independent Groups Angry Young Men & Ideologically Motivated Foot Soldiers
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 8th 2010

Many of these angry young men join insurgent groups for a regular income and a sense of empowerment and identity they cannot find elsewhere, rather than for ideological reasons. In Afghanistan these young men have a number of serious, legitimate grievances - corruption, civilian casualties, a lack of jobs and services, and a failure to establish the rule of law – which have created high levels of anger among civilian populations.
What is the Recruitment Timeline?

 Anger and Discontent: The lack of social and economic opportunities causes frustration and feelings of alienation among young men.
 Recruitment: Faced with these bleak prospects, the Angry Young Men become easy targets for insurgent recruiters who offer an alternative vision.
 Training and Indoctrination: In this stage, the recruits move from being passive supporters of the insurgency to active participation in it through indoctrination.
 Violent Action: The new recruits have been formed into insurgent fighters ready to commit violent acts against all enemies of their cause, for example, as suicide bombers, regular fighters or employed to plant road side bombs or kidnap foreigners. We normally only engage these young men with military and police actions in this stage.
This process is illustrated in the timeline below:
Enfranchisement of Angry Young Men using Non-Violent Security Instruments
In any country, youths need a combination of self-respect and a sense of worth, a relevant, contributing role in the community, the ability to provide for oneself and one‟s family, and a sense of belonging. Policies and measures that can help young men acquire this sense of “enfranchisement”, and deter them from being recruited by violent actors, should be considered as “Non-Violent Security Instruments” (NVSIs).
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 9th 2010

First, it is crucial to engage with potential insurgents in the earliest stage. In this phase, disaffected youths are still capable of being integrated into society. Second, it is important to look at each community that is vulnerable to recruitment and consider a tailored package of necessary measures - marriage or family allowances, educational opportunities, meaningful employment, or home ownership.6
The diagram below shows how the deployment of these NVSIs can interfere with the recruitment and radicalisation process in southern Afghanistan.
These Non Violent Security Instruments must be given the same political and financial support as classic security instruments such a military and police actions.
Examples of Non-Violent Security Instruments to be considered when addressing the needs of local communities in Afghanistan include:
 Marriage allowances and grants for necessary wedding celebrations (In southern Afghanistan these costs range from $3000 to $5000, a sum out of the reach of the average young Afghan man, especially given high levels of unemployment and underemployment.)
 Family allowances and grants for new families on the birth of their first child, to encourage building a family and related social stability.
 Housing allowances and programmes to support the construction of independent housing for the new family, along with land allotments for residences and businesses (drawing on the model of land titling, as used in Peru)
6 Fick, N and Lockhart, C (2010) The Economic Imperative: Stabilising Afghanistan Through Economic Growth. Center for a New American Security Policy Brief. Available at: http://www.cnas.org/files/documents/publications/Economic%20Imperative_FickLockhart_April2010_code507_policybrief.pdf
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
10
 Monthly stipends for poor families which could follow the example of the “Bolsa Familia” poverty alleviation programme in Brazil
 A widespread, dramatic programme of micro-financing, as well as capital grants to small- and medium-size businesses
Anger Levels Rising as a Result of Operation Moshtarak
78% of Afghans interviewed by ICOS “often or always” feel angry. This figure is up from previous ICOS research: interviews conducted from May-July 2008 indicated that 39% of men interviewed felt angry all the time. Now, with Marjah‟s opium economy being strangled by international and Afghan action, these disenfranchised and disaffected citizens will have even fewer ways to make a living or support their families. The subsequent anger and discontent, makes the young men of Marjah susceptible to recruitment and radicalisation by insurgent groups.
7
Q 5A Who or what are you angry with? NATO-ISAF: occupation, civilian casualties, night raids
239
45% War and lack of security
185
35% Taliban: killings, suicide bombers, IEDs
46
9% No Answer
29
6% Personal situation
11
2% The role of Pakistan
11
2% General situation in the country
7
1% Afghan government
6
1% Lashkar Gah-Kandahar Highway
5
1% Poppy field eradication
5
1% Unemployment / Poverty
3
1% Corruption
2
0.4%

Due to methodological problems, this question omits 100 interviews from Kandahar and 125 from Lashkar Gah in March.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
11
Interfering with the Taliban recruitment process
In particular, unmarried men lack the social and economic responsibilities that married men have, making them more vulnerable to recruitment by insurgents. This is supported by the research: half of Afghans interviewed believe that the Taliban can recruit single men more easily than married men.
In the medium and long term, policies to limit the appeal of the Taliban among the young men of Marjah would prevent the insurgents from returning and establishing a foothold.
Q 4 What can we do to avoid young people from joining the Taliban? Money to allow them to get married and start a family
352
82% Jobs
318
74% Withdrawal of NATO-ISAF forces
192
45% Better security
169
40% Education
107
25% Change the conduct of NATO-ISAF forces
12
3% Other
5
1% Reconstruction of the country
3
1% No answer
6
1%
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
12

For instance, 82% of Afghans interviewed believe that financially supporting unmarried men to get married would be an effective method of stopping them from being recruited by the Taliban. This would provide them with social and financial responsibilities as well as a sense of empowerment, reducing the attractiveness of joining an insurgent group.
Addressing the needs of the people of Marjah and Kandahar through Non-Violent Security Instruments
Sufficient time, planning and financial backing should have been provided in Operation Moshtarak for implementing Non-Violent Security Instruments (NVSIs). These NVSIs, including measures such as refugee aid, effective counter-narcotics policies, the preparation of suitable refugee camps, and medical assistance, must be integrated into military responses in Afghanistan, and should have been accorded the same level of support as classic security instruments during Operation Moshtarak.
The cost of these measures – these “camps in a box” - compared to the military effort is extremely small, and the return on this investment in this environment can be much higher than the money spent on direct military action.
Incorporating NVSIs into the international community‟s planning process for Operation Moshtarak would have reduced the anger of the civilian population, limiting the Taliban‟s ability to recruit and radicalise Marjah‟s angry young men. The lack of relief assistance and the resulting humanitarian crisis has handed a free propaganda victory to the insurgency, which can now use streams of refugees and unwarranted civilian casualties as evidence of NATO‟s „brutal occupation‟.

This humanitarian system would have provided a temporary „bridge‟ of non-violent security measures between the NATO assault and the establishment of the “government in a box”, which would provide governance and services.
It must be recognised by all parties that, in complex and insecure situations, aid agencies might not be the best actor to deliver these essential humanitarian supplies for security or capacity reasons. In those circumstances NATO is the only agency in the region with the capability to deploy aid and relief programmes, and all relevant agencies should be prepared to have NATO forces deliver these programmes until the humanitarian and aid agencies have the capacity and willingness to do so.
On the other hand, 63% of Afghans interviewed by ICOS do not believe that paying the insurgents off would cause them to leave the Taliban. 59% of Afghans interviewed believe that providing jobs to Taliban fighters will draw them away from the insurgency. However, the Afghan economy is already struggling to provide employment to citizens who are not connected to the insurgency. Creating new jobs would be a formidable challenge.8
8 Felbab-Brown, V (2010) Negotiations And Reconciliation With The Taliban: The Key Policy Issues and Dilemmas. Brookings Institute. Available at: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/articles/2010/0128_taliban_felbabbrown/0128_taliban_felbabbrown.pdf
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
13

A Security Eco-System – Getting the Right Balance for Stability
Acknowledging the role of NVSIs must be combined with a “security eco-system approach”. Security must be viewed – in Marjah, Kandahar and elsewhere – as a comprehensive framework incorporating a balance between elements such as military force, development, justice, humanitarian assistance, and socio-economic activity. This balance must be determined by the “natural habitat” of the conflict area – its political, economic, and social context. Long-term environmental sustainability is dependent on a finely tuned balance between different elements within the natural eco-system; similarly, long-term security is dependent on a targeted combination of appropriate strategies. All the elements in the eco-system (military, development, aid, political affairs) are connected one to another – and an action or reaction in one area affects the other areas.
Applying a security eco-system approach in Marjah – and in the upcoming Kandahar operation - is essential to demonstrate that the international community can find a sustainable approach to the larger crisis in Afghanistan.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
14
B. Responding to Refugees; Strengthening Development and Aid Capacity
The weeks of prior planning for Operation Moshtarak were a welcome step by NATO to raise awareness among the Afghan people of the upcoming offensive. However, there was a dramatic lack of capacity and preparation in the development and political communities for the humanitarian consequences of Operation Moshtarak. The policy mix robustly deployed military instruments in an environment with weak humanitarian, social, and economic tools and capacity.
The United States defence establishment is well aware of the institutional difficulties which underpin these failings. In a recent article for Foreign Affairs, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates acknowledged the need for much more coherent planning process, which would allow US assistance in conflict zones to be delivered more effectively.9
High numbers of refugees
Large numbers of refugees fled the conflict zone, many of them to Lashkar Gah and the informal refugee camps around and inside the city. There is no consensus on the number of refugees who fled (see box below): the numbers are estimated at between 3,500 and 4,000 families. The presence of displaced people is supported by interviewees, almost all of whom stated that the operation had caused new flows of refugees.
Figures suggest that the average size of a poor Afghan household is eight people, meaning that more than 30,000 refugees have probably left their homes. Anecdotal evidence from ICOS field research reveals that many families were forced to walk many kilometres in the middle of the night, through dangerous conditions and at risk from landmines and roadside bombs.
9 Gates, R (2010) „Helping Others Defend Themselves: The Future of US Security Assistance‟ Foreign Affairs May/June 2010.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
15
“Exact figures [for refugees] are hard to come by, but the number of displaced families still unable to return to their homes following the fighting runs into the thousands”. International Committee of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, March 510
UN and other aid agencies were also overwhelmed. Although 15 aid agencies were asked to assist with supporting refugees within Lashkar Gah, only two – the International Committee for the Red Cross and Red Crescent, and the Afghan Red Crescent Society – had responsibility for areas outside Lashkar Gah.

No relief organisations appear to have had any existing capacity within Marjah itself, and none of them had or were provided with sufficient resources, staff, or information to assess and care for the tide of displaced people. Food, shelter, and medical supplies were in extremely short supply, contributing to serious anger and resentment among the refugees and the local population who witnessed their plight.
“Most of the refugees left with only their children. They left everything behind. They need help.” Mohibullah Khan, police officer
Despite the extensive publicity which the operation received, aid agencies do not appear to have been briefed or consulted sufficiently in advance, or given appropriate resources to respond to the needs of the community.
The principal demand expressed by 70% of Afghans interviewed is the immediate provision of help from NATO, the international community and the Afghan government: they expect shelter and food for the refugees, the rebuilding of destroyed property and the clearing of landmines. As already confirmed in previous reports on the security and development situation in Afghanistan, the needs of the Afghan people often are more basic than illustrated by the international political discourse: first and foremost, the Afghan people ask for the provision of basic services like food, shelter and medical assistance for their families.
In a situations where the aid community is unable to meet the needs of the local population during military operations, military forces should be delegated responsibility for the aid effort, as the only actor with the resources and access to deploy across the conflict zone, until the aid community are able and willing to step in. To respond otherwise leaves these families in the heart of a military operation with no assistance. This is a result which can easily be argued to be unacceptable on a humanitarian level, and certainly is dramatically counter-productive in a “hearts and minds” campaign.
Despite pronouncements and promises about hearts and minds, the offensive illustrates that the current paradigm for tackling security crises is still over-reliant on the deployment of military force. Development, aid, and counter-narcotics issues are not accorded the same level of political and financial support and effort as military endeavours, which creates a situation where those military endeavours are viewed with serious hostility by the local population whose support we seek and need. 67% of the Afghans interviewed by ICOS believe that the military operation was “bad for the Afghan people”.
10 ICRC Press Release, March 5 2010.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
16
Additionally, we see from the interviews a belief that the Taliban will be able to return to Marjah, a view supported by 59% of Afghans interviewed.
This has, in turn, seriously damaged NATO‟s reputation in the south of the country. 67% of the Afghans interviewed opposed a strong NATO presence in their province, and 71% say that foreign forces should leave Afghanistan entirely.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
17
Lack of substantial progress in the fight against the Taliban is also reflected by the fact that 67% of Afghans interviewed doubted that NATO could ultimately prevail over the insurgency. 14% of respondents were unequivocal in their conviction that the international community and volunteered the Afghan government would “never” succeed.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
18
Agreement on Ends, no agreement on the Means
At the same time, 67% of interviewed Afghans say that international and government forces should conduct a military operation against insurgents in Kandahar. This may come as a surprise, given the overall negative assessment of the impact of the Operation Moshtarak.
Yet the underlying positive message is the desire of the Afghans to be rid of the Taliban‟s presence and violence: what they do not want, however, is to bear the type of unmitigated impact of the fighting between the insurgents and NATO forces that they and their families are experiencing.
14% of respondents also volunteered a third answer of “Never”, which is included in the No section of this chart.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
19
An alternative potential target for NATO operations would be the highway between Lashkar Gah and Kandahar, which is often not passable due to Taliban activity. Clearing this vital strategic artery would have immediate benefits for counter-insurgency efforts in the south and east of Afghanistan. It would also allow Afghan citizens to travel and conduct business more easily, improving their sense of security and freedom. Afghans interviewed are strongly supportive of this goal.
“They must clear the road, this is the first thing. In the past, we could use the road and there were no problems but now we cannot go one kilometre without any security.” Said, journalist
The approval of many Afghans for operations along the road and in Kandahar emphasises their general agreement with the ends, but not the means, of NATO actions. Conducting these operations will be supported by the Afghan people, but only if they are carried out with sensitivity for civilian life and the needs of Afghans.
Poppy Eradication: Fuel to the fire
Tackling the district‟s opium trade was one of the key reasons for selecting Marjah as a target for this operation. As a result, poppy farmers in and around the area of Marjah were been targeted during and after Operation Moshtarak with poppy crop eradication campaigns. This is remarkable, as the United States policy last year moved away from support for crop eradication. Richard Holbrooke, Special Envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, confirmed that this policy had sent poppy farmers straight into the arms of the Taliban. As such, counter-narcotics interventions focusing on crop eradication work counter-productively and seriously complicate the military‟s counter-insurgency campaign.
In the run-up to Operation Moshtarak, Marjah was dubbed the thriving “opium capital” of Helmand province. It is true that opium stockpiles, packaging workshops and makeshift processing plants were found in this area. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) identifies the district of Nad Ali as one of the major opium poppy cultivation centres, but at the same time includes it among twelve districts of Helmand where cultivation is high11. As such, in Helmand, which currently cultivates 57% of all poppies in Afghanistan and produces 59% of all its opium, the district of Nad Ali cannot be singled out as the main opium district12.
The reality remains that poppy farming is still an integral part of the region‟s economy, and eradication is strongly opposed by local Afghans. Therefore, a sound counter-insurgency campaign should not include negative counter-narcotics instruments which create a negative impact in local communities. This risks further eroding their crucial support for the international presence of military troops and their activities on the ground.
11 UNODC, Afghanistan. Opium Winter Assessment (January 2009), p. 36.
12 UNODC, Afghanistan Opium Survey 2009 (December 2009), pp. 29, 30.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
20

Growing Discontent over Poppy Eradication
Although there are strong links between the Taliban insurgency and the illegal opium economy, counter-insurgency and counter-narcotics policies should not be mixed in a way that disengages the Afghan population further from the Afghan government and the international community. However, this has happened as a result of Operation Moshtarak and subsequent poppy crop eradications. For instance, local reports indicate that farmers resisting the eradication of their poppies in Baba Ali killed six Afghan police officers. In addition, poppy farmers that fled the fighting in Marjah have returned home to find their poppy fields destroyed just weeks before the harvest (starting around early May), leaving them without a livelihood and unable to feed their families.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
21
Bringing security to Marjah does not, unfortunately, immediately give the impoverished poppy farmers a real choice between the illegal opium economy and legal alternatives. The latter are still not available, despite the international community‟s million-dollar rural development and alternative livelihood policies. More than half of all Afghans interviewed by ICOS state that no other crops can even be grown in Marjah.
The failure of compensation policies
There have been recent reports about US Marines starting to pay Afghan poppy farmers to destroy their poppy crops voluntarily.13 While, at first glance such a counter-narcotics policy looks attractive, it has serious shortcomings. Most importantly, compensating farmers for not growing opium or for destroying their crops does not create an incentive for farmers to switch immediately to other crops.
While these schemes normally include the provision of fertilisers and seeds for alternative crops, poppy farmers have in the past shown a tendency to perceive such schemes as an easy way to make money by continuing to grow poppies the year after. As such, a compensation scheme might work for one growing season, but after that the scheme needs to be continued for several years as sustainable alternative crops are still not available in the short to medium term. The other major problem is that compensation schemes provide a strong incentive for non-poppy growing farmers to enter the business as an easy way to get money and agricultural inputs.
Poppy for Medicine: A Counter-Narcotics, Counter-insurgency, and Economic Development Tool
There is a positive way to bring together counter-narcotics and counter-insurgency policy in Marjah without increasing anger or disillusionment amongst the region‟s poppy farmers. This can be done by implementing a Poppy for Medicine project, which would provide licenses to selected farmers to grow poppies for the local production of essential medicines such as morphine under a tightly controlled system.14
Poppy for Medicine is an alternative counter-narcotics and counter-insurgency strategy that has been successfully implemented in countries such as India and Turkey, with the support of the United States. While boosting the rural economy and diversifying it over time, Poppy for Medicine also integrates farmers and their entire communities into the legal economy, thus driving a wedge between these farming communities and the Taliban insurgency that currently benefits substantially from the illicit opium economy.
Counter-insurgency through Grassroots Economic Development to Win Hearts and Minds
Locally owned and operated, Poppy for Medicine village-based poppy control models would have beneficial ink-blot effects on security and economic development in the regions around the villages, and thus complement the international community‟s mission in Afghanistan. As an economic development-orientated counter-narcotics initiative, Poppy for Medicine projects would impact significantly on the international community‟s efforts to counter the insurgency.
Field research has revealed that the vast majority of Afghan insurgents are driven primarily by economic incentives. These insurgents join the insurgency because they have no jobs and no ways to feed their families. By triggering economic development in rural communities and integrating these communities within the Afghan legal economy and government system, the Poppy for Medicine projects would decrease insurgents‟ recruitment bases.
ICOS is currently calling for a scientific Poppy for Medicine pilot project in a few selected areas to see how such a project model could effectively boost rural development. It has been investigating the Poppy for Medicine model on the ground since 2005 and has come up with a detailed blueprint with concrete implementation protocols.
13 „Marines pay Afghan farmers to destroy opium‟, Reuters 15 April 2010. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE63E1BL20100415
14 For more information about the Poppy for Medicine project, visit http://www.poppyformedicine.net.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
22
C. Grassroots Political Dynamics
Addressing People’s Needs is Critical to Stabilising Marjah
The declaration in advance of the Marjah operation that there was a “government in a box, ready to roll in” shows that NATO and the international community have in principle learnt a lesson from previous years. They have acknowledged that there is a need to focus on perceptions. Firstly, they must focus on the perceptions of their domestic political audiences, who need valid reasons – and demonstrations of success – for supporting the war in Afghanistan and the presence of NATO forces in their community. Providing tangible, visible benefits of the international military presence is a necessary element in sustaining domestic support.
Secondly, the international community have emphasised publicly that military operations should be designed to win the hearts and minds of the Afghan people. This is an overdue shift from a security policy focused on military indicators of „progress‟, such as the number of dead Taliban. Military action that is not followed by an effective action plan for aid, reconstruction and political engagement with the local population will only serve to inflame tensions – and therefore provide the Taliban insurgency with a new pool of potential recruits.
Marjah is a clear opportunity to test the commitment of NATO and the Afghan government. The district‟s new government must be fully resourced, supported by the West, and competent. Social and economic structures must also be seen as Non-Violent Security Instruments and integrated into NATO‟s short-, medium-, and long-term planning for the region. This would help Marjah‟s young men to acquire a sense of “enfranchisement”, undo the resentment created by NATO‟s attack on the district, address their legitimate grievances and deter them from being recruited by Taliban insurgents. A new equation for counter-insurgency operations is needed which addresses the suffering, civilian casualties, and other negative impacts created by military action.

A new “COIN Impact Equation”: Balance Negative Impact with Positive Impact: Positive Impact must be Greater than Negative Impact It is clear that even the most meticulous military planning and sensitively conducted combat operations cannot exclude the possibility of civilian suffering. During the course of future operations against the Taliban, the military needs a much more robust contingency plan to respond to inevitable instances civilian casualties, displacement, or destruction of property. To meet the above equation, this negative impact must be countered by positive impact, which must be greater than the negative impact. Measures such as financial compensation help with reconstruction and trust-building campaigns among the afflicted communities must be implemented immediately.
Resentment over civilian casualties
The most damaging negative impact of the military operation comes from the displacement of local populations, civilian casualties and night raids. The great majority of Afghans questioned believe that many civilians have been killed during the Marjah operation, with estimates of more than 200. These estimates reflect a sharp rise from the figures attested by aid agencies and human rights groups.15 The number of civilian deaths is equivalent to between a quarter and a half of all insurgent deaths, a discouraging ratio for a “hearts and minds” operation.
15 The Afghan Red Crescent Society estimated on March 16 that 35 civilians had been killed and 37 injured.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
23

Operation Moshtarak not only failed to win the hearts and minds of the people of Marjah, but it has actually driven them further away from the international community. The offensive has provoked anger, disillusionment, and even more hostility. 61% of those interviewed by ICOS stated that the operation has made them feel more negative about the presence and activities of foreign forces.
Lack of contingency plans for civilian suffering
So far, there is no clear evidence that the international community has instituted a comprehensive, politically effective system of providing compensation to all those who lost relatives or property in the assault.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
24
“The international community must pay a fine for this because of what they have done; they must compensate these people for the damage done by the fighting.” Mohammad Nasim Aka, unemployed
To regain its lost credibility amongst the Afghan people, the West should generate positive outcomes by engaging in a series of symbolic political and cultural acts (see box below) to restore trust and counteract Taliban propaganda before, during and after the Kandahar operation.
Grassroots Engagement with Local Communities – A Potent “Hearts and Minds” Tool Restoring Mosques and Shrines As part of the initiatives aimed at grassroots engagement and, when necessary, forgiveness for civilian displacement and casualties, an intensive programme to repair and renovate major mosques and shrines across southern Afghanistan should be undertaken. This can be undertaken as part of a “request for forgiveness” for the civilian casualties, destruction of property, displacement and night raids that are at the heart of much of the resentment against the NATO presence in the south. This would also work to counteract the Taliban‟s propaganda, which portrays Westerners as anti-Muslim and seeking to destroy Afghanistan‟s cultural and religious heritage. Quran Distribution Programme An equally effective measure of showing respect for and support of the local culture and religion would be a Holy Quran distribution programme. Possession of a copy of the Holy Quran is highly valued among rural Afghans yet unattainable to many because of widespread poverty. Distributing copies of the Quran, perhaps with the help of local religious leaders, would directly counter the Taliban propaganda that accuses NATO of pursuing an anti-Islamic, “crusader” agenda.
Other methods of connecting and engaging with the Afghan people at the grassroots level would include the provision of land and marriage allowances, referred to above. These would allow ordinary Afghans a tangible stake in their country‟s future. Supporting such initiatives would be a major step towards restoring the international community‟s credibility in the eyes of Afghans.
On a broader level, it is clear that military action alone is unable to bring peace in Afghanistan. To build a lasting political settlement, reaching out to insurgents is essential.16 The Afghans interviewed strongly support a process of dialogue with the Taliban, with 74% approving of negotiations.
16 Dorronsoro, G (2010) Afghanistan – Searching for Political Agreement. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/searching_polit_agreement.pdf
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
25
Conclusions: Operation Moshtarak causes Afghan Hearts and Minds to slip further away
The lack of attention to the welfare, lives and property of civilian communities during Operation Moshtarak has had severe and negative consequences in the battle to win the hearts and minds of the Afghan people. Operation Moshtarak and the devastation to the local community that it has brought about have generated high levels of resentment of the international presence in Afghanistan, and have provided a perfect recruiting tool for the Taliban.17
Despite indications - such as the idea of a “government in a box” - that the international community and NATO have recognised the need to prioritise the Afghan people, much more attention should have been paid to the balance between Marjah‟s social, political, economic, and security imperatives.
The international community must view stability, throughout Afghanistan, as a „security eco-system‟, requiring a comprehensive framework of investment strategies, developmental efforts, governance reforms, and limited military operations. The prospects for future generations of Afghans can only be achieved through this long-term, comprehensive approach.
Operation Moshtarak raises many unanswered questions about the future conduct of the Afghan war. The choice of Marjah as a target has served political, not military objectives, demonstrating an easy „victory‟ in order to boost support for the war among domestic political constituencies. However the lack of preparation and forward planning means that, ironically, Operation Moshtarak now serves as a lesson in the international community‟s failures in Afghanistan.
In the upcoming months Marjah must not be ignored or marginalised: the blow-back from the flaws in Operation Moshtarak must be addressed, and the international community must redouble its efforts to provide security and development to the Afghan people there.
Learning lessons from Marjah is also critical for the upcoming operation in Kandahar. Urgent steps must be taken to reverse failing policies and prevent a repeat of the negative impacts of Operation Moshtarak. In
17 Ruttig, T (2009) The Other Side: Dimensions of the Afghan Insurgency: Causes, Actors and Approaches to „Talks‟. Afghanistan Analysts Network. Available at: http://aan-afghanistan.com/uploads/200907%20AAN%20Report%20Ruttig%20-%20The%20Other%20Side.PDF
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
26
particular, NATO and international community must engage with grassroots communities in Kandahar with a series of “Dramatic Positive Local Actions” to reshape relationships with this hyper-politicized community.
Timing is critical: this must be undertaken before, during, and after operations in Kandahar to build lasting and sustainable support among the Afghan people.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
27
ICOS Recommendations: Full-Spectrum Advanced Civilian Planning Process
Short and long-term initiatives which provide social and economic assistance to the people of Marjah and Kandahar should be urgently deployed. These initiatives should constitute a Full-Spectrum (covering military, aid, developmental, and political aspects) Advanced Civilian Planning Process, which would tackle the roots of the insurgency and deliver real benefits for the Afghan people.
A. Interfering with Taliban Recruitment
 Marriage Allowance Scheme. A marriage-allowance scheme should be implemented for the young men in Kandahar and elsewhere. Providing financial assistance to cover the high costs of a dowry and a wedding would provide them with a stable family situation and socio-economic responsibilities, reducing the risks of Taliban recruitment.
 Land Allowances. Providing poor rural Afghans with parcels of land would give them a strong stake in the future of the country. This would be widely welcomed amongst the landless poor.
B. Refugee Aid and Support
 Fully-Resourced Aid Initiatives should be deployed. These should include the deployment of ambulances and field hospitals for the civilian population in the conflict zone to provide flexible and accessible medical treatment.
 Establishment of “Camps in a Box”. These should be pre-designed facilities for those displaced by the fighting containing all necessary elements – food, clean water, flexible medical treatment (including ambulances), shelter, and above all security.
 Active Engagement with Displaced People. Our research teams in Helmand found that many refugees from Marjah had not been actively sought out by Afghan or international representatives. Refugees should be actively encouraged to move into purpose-built camps, which must be highly publicised. Moreover, the displaced people of Marjah must be supported in returning to their homes. This should involve logistical assistance (including transportation) and financial aid and compensation.
 Provision of Food Aid Surge and other Emergency Relief. The citizens of Marjah and Kandahar – including the displaced people - must be provided with essential supplies to secure their basic humanitarian needs.
 Integration of Local Aid Agencies into Humanitarian Efforts. Relief organisations should be fully resourced and financially supported by NATO forces and the international community.
 Military Delivery of Aid. In areas in which relief agencies are unable or unwilling to operate due to security issues, NATO should support and implement development and aid projects in areas.
 Poppy for Medicine Pilot Project. Poppy for Medicine pilot projects should be implemented in southern Afghanistan before the upcoming growing season (starting in October- November 2010). Farmers should be sold licences to grow opium poppies which would be processed into morphine in local facilities and sold to the central government in Kabul, supported by the international community.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
28
C. Positively Influencing Grassroots Political Dynamics
 Dramatic Positive Local Actions. These should demonstrate NATO‟s commitment to the well-being of local communities. A response to civilian suffering should include public statements of apology and regret for the civilian casualties of NATO operations, but this should only be one element in a larger strategy aimed at reshaping the relationship at the grassroots level in advance of the military operations.
 Counter Perceptions of Anti-Islamic Activities. Operation Moshtarak and the international operations in Afghanistan generally, are often portrayed in Taliban propaganda as “a War against Islam”. Countering this perception is vital to winning hearts and minds. Implementing a programme to restore local mosques and religious facilities, to demonstrate that the international community respects the religion and culture of the Afghan people. A Quran distribution programme could be a companion piece to this initiative.
Timing is everything: These or similar programmes, must be undertaken in advance of the offensive in Kandahar, and maintained at a high level before, during, and after the military operations.
Operation Moshtarak: Lessons Learned
May 2010
29

The International Council on Security and Development is an international policy think tank working to combine grassroots research and policy innovation at the intersections of security, development, counter-narcotics and public health issues, online at:
www.icosgroup.net
Contact:
Mr Alexander Jackson
Policy Analyst
+44 782 4444 591
Jackson@icosgroup.net

Through a unique mix of field research – from Afghanistan to Somalia - public reports, films and project implementation, ICOS examines the root causes of current crises, and works to challenge out-of-date perceptions to achieve measurable and direct policy results. ICOS‟s objective is to promote open debate in order to alleviate current governance, development and economic crises and ensure that future policy-making in these areas is informed, humanitarian and delivers impact.
The mission of the Network of European Foundations‟ Mercator Fund is to support innovative philanthropic projects. The Network of European Foundations‟ Mercator Fund works as a catalyst for programmes and initiatives in areas where European foundations and international partners can cooperate on pressing global issues.
www.mercatorfund.net
The Network of European Foundations acts as an operational platform for the development of joint initiatives by foundations and other types of organised philanthropy, as well as hosting programmes related to Europe and the role of Europe on the global stage.
www.nefic.org

WHAT ABOUT AFGHANISTAN?

We don’t care and we won’t mention it in this election

All the three UK political parties are intentionally avoiding one question during this general election and that one million dollar question is the war in Afghanistan. It is more than nine years that the politician in this country are waging war and supporting the a corrupt regime and war criminals in Afghanistan where more than eighty thousand innocent Afghans are killed and nearly 300 young innocent British soldiers sacrificed their lives for the lies of Bush, Blair, Gordon Brown, Obama and Osama. Nearly seventy-five percent people in this country are opposed to the unwinnable war in Afghanistan and want the troops to come home. It is also worth mentioning that here in Scotland it looks like the SNP government have also adapted the same policy as I have not heard them in their election campaign officially calling for the withdrawal of UK troops from Afghanistan since elected to the office on the anti war ticket. The ComRes survey for the Independent and ITV news finds that nearly three-quarters of the people in this country are not supporting the war in Afghanistan and almost 55 percent do not understand why the UK is there where the cost is more than four billion a year.
The second televised debate on Sky TV was a total embarrassment and a disaster for the people of Afghanistan who are killed by the west for no reason other than Afghans and also an insult for the British soldiers who were killed and still being killed. The leaders failed to mention a word about the dead of Afghans and should have apologised on live TV debate to the deceased families who are the innocent victims of this imperial war. The NATO occupation of my country continues to kill innocent citizens. Afghans no longer can bear the indiscriminate killing of their young children, pregnant women and other citizens and that is why the resistance to the occupation grow stronger and now shifted to the North of Afghanistan apart from other areas. There is a very strong support for the Taliban and in my opinion the west will never win the war in the south of Afghanistan. A recent survey funded by the US Army in Kandahar revealed that 94 percent of the population there support negotiation with the Taliban and 85 percent regard the Taliban as their own brothers. So any attack in Kandahar is doomed to failure as it was in Marjah. This shows that Afghans do not want the war and are supportive of a political solution but sadly the west does not want to follow that path and are pressing for more troops and destruction of innocent lives. Almost 91% of the Afghan population want a Loya Jirga (grand assembly) to end the conflict but unfortunately the war mongers in the UK and all three main political parties support the unwinnable war there. The British government spent last year four billion and will surely spend more than this in the coming year but have not even secured the Helmand province alone forget about the rest of the country but still refused to talk about the Afghan war in any leaders TV debates. After sacrificing 281 young innocent British soldiers and killing more than eighty thousands innocent Afghans what have Britain the US and NATO achieved. The poppet of the west President Hamid Karzai threatened to join the Taliban if he is not left alone and even said that Afghanistan is occupied and that is why there is resistance to the occupation.
The US president Mr. Obama is blaming Karzai for the American failure and defeat in Afghanistan and also accused him of rigging the election. David Milliband and others called for the replacement of Karzai but sadly there were no better men than Karzai amongst the 32 million populations. What a joke? The real democrats were sidelined by the west and corrupt leaders were supported during the election. In the recent past Karzai is refusing to take orders from the west and is listening to his people rather than the west and his paymasters but the rumours in the western regimes are that there might be grounds for assassination to shoot him because he is a thug. Finally this is a war which cost more than four billion per year, 74 % of the people of this country are opposing it and think this war is unwinnable. This is a war which killed 281 young innocent British soldiers and countless of innocent Afghans who are killed but not even mentioned in the debates. The west is sending more troops to kill and die in order to support a man and his regime that does not even control the capital itself. The insurgents and others controlled three doors out of four which lead to Kabul. When Afghanistan pops up in this election the main subject of complaint is that the helicopters do not work and the killing of innocent Afghans are not allowed to be mentioned at all. You should be a shamed of yourselves Mr. Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Cleg for such leadership, accountability and humanity. The innocent Afghans who were killed and are being killed by your bombs will never forgive you.

Mohammad N Asif
Exiled Afghan Journalist and
President, Scottish Afghan Society

INTERNATIONAL PALYERS MEETING IN LONDON TO PLAY WITH THE NATION OF AFGHANISTAN AND ITS PEOPLE

INTERNATIONAL PALYERS MEETING IN LONDON TO PLAY WITH THE NATION OF AFGHANISTAN AND ITS PEOPLE

Press release: Embargoed till Thursday 28^th January 2010

The Scottish Afghan Exiles rejects such International conference of International players who are gathering in London on the 28^th of January in the name peace and reconciliation. Afghanistan does not need such a conference where third parties who are not even Afghans decide the future of 32 million Afghans.

Nine years on and the west still do not know what to do about Afghanistan. The London conference is based on to buy the Taliban and to set a side 500 million US dollar. In the nine years of invasion the west still does not want to know why the other guy fights. After nine years of war against the Taliban and other groups such as Hezb-e- Islami and the Haqani group and yet the west continues to deny that their enemies are fighting them in the name of Ideology, Faith, Tribe and Tradition.

The Afghan government is on the heading on the wrong road to achieve peace.

• The President of Afghanistan should set directly with the enemy rather than going through a third party. He should form a commission of Tribal elders to negotiate with the enemy on behalf of his government rather than coming to London.
• The British Prime Minster and his allies should have invited the real enemy who fight them to London conference rather than Hamid Karzai.
• Those who fight the invasion are not invited it is a failure for the conference it self
• Who is going to guarantee the lives of those who join the peace process will not be killed and assassinated by Northern Alliance, the US and others? Karzai has no power to provide that.
• Two hundred and fifty Young innocent British soldiers are killed in Afghanistan but the Britain and its allies still do not know who to talk to.
• No matter how hard Gordon Brown try he will still not win the next general election as we all know it is just a PR exercise and nothing more than that.

• Finally this conference will be another slap on the face of Hamid Karzai and the west is going to humiliate again but the Afghan people will be dumped by the west and this conference in particular.
  
  For further information please contact: Mohammad N Asif, Chair, Scottish Afghan EXILES
• nmasif@hotmail.com

Note to the Editors

Afghanistan is in a mess now and no one is able to fix the problem except the Afghans themselves. According to the reports more than £6 million in cash is being smuggled out of Afghanistan every day, a report by anti-fraud investigators has revealed.
The sum is equivalent to more than £2.3bn a year, or more than three times the government's official tax and customs revenue, in a country plagued by corruption. Investigators found the cash leaving Afghanistan is taken out mainly stuffed in suitcases through Kabul airport and most ended up in the United Arab Emirates. Other Reuters Corruption costs Afghans $2.5 billion a year, a United Nations agency said on Tuesday, with the scale of bribery matching Afghanistan's opium trade.

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) said a national survey it conducted showed Afghans were more concerned by public dishonesty than insecurity or unemployment.

"Bribery is a crippling tax on people who are already among the world's poorest," UNODC's Executive Director Antonio Maria Costa said in a statement, adding the scale of corruption was equivalent to nearly a quarter of the country's economic output. On the top of these War criminals such General Fahim (first vice-President) and General Abdul Rashid Doustom are back in his cabinet.

The Scottish Afghan Exiles rejects the London conference as we believe it does not represent the interest of the Afghan people. We welcome any peace negotiation which benefits the people of Afghanistan. We urge the British government to involve the Taliban and other groups to be preset in the London conference and not through a third party who do not represent the interest of Afghans. We urge the international community to hold direct talks with the enemy and reach to a political settlement.

YOU DECIDE ABOUT THE THIEF

Dear friends of the world please click here on the link where you will see Dr. Abdullah Abdullah the Afghan Presidential candidate who is challenged by two brave Afghan women in the United States in a public meeting. When Abdullah Abdullah was the Foreign Minister of Afghanistan, he stole $10 million dollar. On his visit to the USA he was questioned about the money by the two women but the thief had no answer to give. When he failed to provide an answer he amazingly told the the two ladies that "I have done it so what can you do about it". Now the western world want him to be the President of Afghanistan so he can steal more. YOU DECIDE

Click here to watch the video of  Dr. Abdullah Abdullah admitting taking the $10 million dollar bribe.
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bCQk6bM6hTA

AFGHAN ELECTION GOES TO RUN-OFF

So what difference does it make to Afghans?

Both candidates are more corrupt than one another

The war in Afghanistan stinks: The land is still illegally occupied by the imperial powers that got no regards for the people of Afghanistan.

80,000 innocent Afghans killed + 222 young British Boys lost their lives

Resistance Groups have permanent bases in 80% of Afghanistan

The sooner it ends, the better

Simon Jenkins said that “the Afghan war has no real bearing on western security and is merely cover for the western politicians to avoid confronting their past mistakes”. True, perhaps the Nobel peace prize could at last vindicate itself. Perhaps Obama should have refused to continue the slaughter in Afghanistan and accept that it is time to go home and earn his award.

The American, British and French pressure finally subdued the Afghan President Hamid Karzai to accept a runoff in Afghanistan's disputed election. Hamid Karzai has realised that without listening to his masters there is no any other way out except to accept their decision for rigging the elections. The other important point which the west intentionally does not want to mention is, the vote rigging of Abdullah Abdullah. Did he not steal any votes? Common, he is a professional thief from Northern Alliance. Stealing has become his profession since 19982.

The Afghan people are tired of the west for imposing imperial ideas and western style of democracy which no one wants. I am very sure the turnout for the second round will not be even 15 %. There will also be concerns over the security situation - and there's no guarantee that there won't be a repeat of the fraud, which seriously marred the first round of voting. Afghanistan is not an independent country and it is taken from poor Afghans by the imperial powers. The west once promised us reconstruction, employment, jobs, hospitals and above all democracy, human rights and of course the very popular western slogan (women rights). Afghanistan does not need elections and troops, what it needs are resources. You guys should recall your broken promises which were made to Afghans in 2001 just prior to the illegal occupation of our land. The United States and its junior partner in crime the United Kingdom promised to re-build Afghanistan, create employment, hospitals, education, schools, roads, security and stability. Unfortunately as always, rather than fulfilling your promises what you have given Afghans are B52, F16, killed their loved ones, destroyed their houses, ruined their future, snatch their country away from them and have turned the whole region into a battle zone.

On one side the foreign occupiers talk about peace but on the other side you are sending another 40,000 more troops. For the local Afghans it does not make any sense. Did the illegal occupation of Afghanistan by US and UK make the world any safer? No- it makes the world a more dangerous place and in fact more innocent Afghans and young innocent British soldiers have been killed. No Afghans have travelled from Afghanistan and attacked any western country but instead the west came there and attacked Afghanistan and started a vicious war against poor but proud Afghans. So now the west have decided that Karzai should be stripped of outright win and Afghanistan should be continued to be occupied and run by the imperial powers the way they want to run it.

No matter who wins the next round and become the President, it will make no difference to the people of Afghanistan under the current circumstances. The future government will still be dominated by Warlords, Drug Lords, Corrupt Ministers, Security Commanders, Rapists, Thugs, and most importantly people who are War Criminals, wanted for the Killing of poor Afghans, but yet are the close friends of the US, UK and its Allies. They will still be in the next Afghan Parliament and will do dirty deals with them at the expense of poor Afghan people.

More innocent Afghans and young innocent British soldiers will die for the lies and sins of Bush, Blair, Obama, Osama, Brown and Mullah Omar. Afghanistan belongs to Afghans and only Afghans should be allowed to decide their own future and no one else have the right to choose our destiny.

Mohammad N Asif

President, Scottish Afghan Exiles

Exiled Afghan Journalist

Mohammad N Asif took part in a public meeting organised by the SSP at Edinburgh Unversity. He asked for an immediate withdrawal of all the foreign troops from Afghanistan. Please click here to see the full story.
http://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/Article.aspx/1403327?UserKey=

THE GREAT GAME: DISCUSSION
Mohammad N Asif was invited by Tricycle to take part in a live audience debate with other politician and experts on Afghanistan. To see the full details please click here.
http://www.tricycle.co.uk/current-programme-pages/special-events/the-great-game-discussions/

Mohammad N Asif  invited by Bristal Stop the War Coalition to speak on Afghanistan at at Stop the War Public meeting. To see the details please click here.
http://bristol.indymedia.org/article/690654

Mohammad N Asif taking part in Scotland Stop the War Nation Conference in Glasgow. To see further details please click here.
http://stopwar.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1049&Itemid=144

Mohammad N Asif was invited by the Greater Manchester Stop the War coalition to speak to a public meeting. To see the details please click here.
http://www.manchesterstopwar.org/reports-activities/483-stop-the-spread-of-war-to-pakistan-meeting-thurs-july-9th.html

Mohammad N Asif Invited by Stop the War Coalition in London to speak to a public meeting on Afghanistan. Please click here to see the details
.http://www.wandsworth-stopwar.org.uk/

Mohammad N Asif was invited to Leeds to take part in a public meeting on Afghanistan. Please click on the link below.
http://www.lcaw.co.uk/

Afghan Democracy Died

The funeral to be announced in September

Afghanistan witnessed the second presidential elections under the US led illegal occupation. Major challenges are awaiting any new president in the war-torn country that has so many unremitting problems: Chronic government corruption, insecurity, unemployment, poverty, lack of practical development schemes, and others. Majority of the Afghans believe that it's not viable to have fair elections under foreign occupation, and the US led occupation is the problem, not the solution, as it failed to achieve any real change into people's lives under US-backed president Karzai. While the election authorities are preparing to publish the first partial results from last week’s presidential election, but the small sample of ten percent may do little to resolve a dispute over the outcome. The August 20th election was marred by fraud, intimidation, violence and low turnout in many areas. The Electoral Complaints Commission says it is looking into at least 250 allegations of misconduct.

Gareth Porter in his current published article talked about the consistent and credible reports from the south, the southeast, Balkh and Panjshir Provinces that tell a clear story. Massive and blatant ballot-stuffing; the removal or invalidation of votes for rival candidates; complete overhaul of ballot-boxes; intimidation of witnesses and Independent Election Commission staff; systematic removal of the publicly displayed tally-sheets. Local IEC representatives are informally releasing figures that bear no relationship to observations on the ground and that are beyond the absurd. Fraud in Afghanistan's presidential election have compromised as many as one in five ballots, a UN official warned today , compounding fears that ballot-stuffing, intimidation and other irregularities could have a decisive impact on the vote.

He further elaborated that Afghanistan's presidential election has long been viewed by U.S. officials and its allies as a key to conferring legitimacy on the Afghan government, but Afghan President Hamid Karzai and his powerful warlord allies have planned to commit large-scale electoral fraud that could have the opposite effect. Karzai has been laying the groundwork for just such a contingency for many months. By all accounts, he has forged political alliances with leading Afghan warlords who control informal militias and tribal networks in the provinces to carry out a vote fraud scheme accounting for a very large proportion of the votes. Afghan President Hamid Karzai has brought a notorious warlord Abdul Rashid Dostum who killed 3000 Taliban prisoner of war. He is an influential backer out of exile just ahead of Thursday's presidential vote – a sign that old-style kingmaking continues to play a powerful role even as the country tries to move to a more modern form of campaigning. Karzai chose another war criminal Muhammad Qasim Fahim , the ethnic Tajik warlord who had been vice-president and defence minister in his government until the 2004 elections, as his running mate. In return for their support, he promised Hazara warlords Haji Muhammad Moheqiq who also killed thousands of innocent pashtuns and Karim Khalili that new provinces would be carved out from largely Hazara districts in Ghazni and Wardak provinces, as reported by Richard Oppel of the New York Times.

Observers found rampant distribution of multiple voting cards. During the third phase of registration, at least four incidents of such abuses in 85 percent of the centres. The voter registration staff was seen handing out cards even before applicants had been registered. In one case, the observers saw about 500 voting cards being given to a single individual. Another element in the Karzai scheme involves the registration of women without their actually being physically present, often on the basis of lists of names given to the registration officials. The list system for registering women was found in 99 percent of registration stations in Paktika province and 90 percent of those in Zabul and Khost provinces.

The Afghan Independent Election Commission announced that more than 10 provinces have no security. Therefore it will be very difficult to operate voting stations in these provinces because of security threat. Currently there are military operations in 65 districts. The Afghan Interior Minister admitted that the elections will not be held in all the 34 Provinces in Afghanistan. It will be impossible for ordinary people to attend voting stations in more than 10 provinces because of the security situation on the ground.

As for Abdullah Abdullah he should sit in a dark room and think for a moment about his past. How on earth he accuses Hamid Karzai of rigging the election where his own supporters forced the voters with Gun point in Balkh Province to vote for him. He should also look at his past where he was part , face and mirror of this corrupt regime for five years. He was the one defending this corrupt regime for years and made millions and filled his bank accounts.

Abdullah Abdullah should teach himself before he accuses others. He was part of the Northern Alliance led by the then war criminal Ahmad Shah Masood. His criminal gang who still occupy important positions was responsible for the killing of 56,000 innocent citizen of Kabul from 1992-1996. His past is very dark and bleak where his group (Northern Alliance) raped, tortured, abducted and murdered political rivals for the control of the capital city. Apart from killing the innocent citizens of Kabul his other victims during the four long years were from Hezb-e- Islami and its supporters and other Pashtun groups. His fighters, the so called Mujahideen (thieves) even stole pillows, mattresses and televisions set from the citizens of Kabul.

He is the man with little or no morality at all. I am sure there will be horse trading in the coming days and Abdullah Abdullah will surely sell his voters to be part of another disabled and corrupt regime and this time his justification and excuse will be the Afghan National Unity. He will not give any consideration to the feelings of his supporters and those who voted for him.

Afghans including presidential candidates, Political Analysts and other experts are complaining that last week’s elections were marred by serious fraud, in contrast to the international community’s assessment that voting was fair.

But to those closer to the process, the elections were characterised by widespread fraud, intimidation and violence, to the point that many seriously questioned the legitimacy and credibility of the results and any future President and his government. For the west to come up with such conclusion that the elections were fair, are scared of their people back at homes. The most recent ABC/Washington Post poll held (13-17/08/09) found that more than 51 % American do not support their government in Afghanistan. Also recently the Independent UK based Newspaper poll revealed that 57% of the British people want their troops out of Afghanistan immediately. So Mr. Obama and the UK which is a tool for the US administration have to lie about the real situation in Afghanistan to deceive their masses back at homes by saying that progress have been made there.

So the Afghans voted but do not know for what they have voted for. I suspect if anyone in Afghanistan voted because of the policies of their favourite candidate. They purely voted for whoever their ethnic leaders told them to vote for. Hence Karzai asked Dostum to deliver him the Uzbek vote. Abdullah Abdullah relies on the Tajik vote, Karzai on the Pashtuns. Afghanistan is a more divided country now than it was before the election and once more the race card is played by imperial powers such as the US, UK, and NATO to divide the Afghans to make it easier for themselves to continue the illegal occupation. Any little hope of optimism and democracy which were there before the election is now gone with the wind and that hope and positivity have vanished permanently by the illegal occupiers of Afghanistan.

Democracy is dead in Afghanistan no matter how much oxygen is pumped by the US, UK and NATO into its mouth. Afghans and the friends of Afghanistan are invited to take part in the funeral of Democracy in September after the result of presidential election. May God bless the Afghan Democracy and rest it soul in peace in the hereafter.

Mohammad N Asif

President, Scottish Afghan Exiles and

Exiled Afghan Journalist